To raise funds from foundations, governments, and corporations, non-profit organizations have to write grant proposals. When writing grant proposals, the organization should keep in mind the audience, to better word the grant proposal. Writing grant proposals for the audience makes them more likely to be approved.
The type of grant proposal enables the organization to keep track of what they are requesting money for. The status of the grant proposal lets the organization know if the proposal still needs work, and if it has been accepted or rejected. Keeping track of the dates for the grant proposal, such as the deadline and the days it was started, reviewed, and submitted, let the organization know how fast it has to complete it.
The cover of the grant proposal provides the first impression for the decision maker. It should be neat and professional-looking, and have the organization’s name and the title of the grant proposal. The organization should also put the name of the foundation, government, or corporation that the grant proposal is for, and if applicable, the name of the grant it is trying to get.
The grant proposal summary should be on the next page of the proposal. It should provide a brief review of the program that the grant will fund, and explain what the money will be used for. The summary works as an overview of the grant proposal, and should continue the first impression. The summary may also be used to remind the decision maker what the proposal is about.
The introduction should briefly discuss the program that the grant will fund. It should explain what the program is doing, or will do, to help people. The introduction should appeal to the audience’s interests and motivation, to make them more likely to approve of the program. Generating approval for the program will make the audience more likely to approve the grant proposal. The end of the introduction should hint at the problems that the program will fix. This provides a good segue into the next section.
After the introduction, the grant proposal should progress into the problem that the program will solve. For example, if the program will feed homeless people, the problem is that homeless people are starving. This section should explain the problem in detail, to show that the organization has done research into the problem. Showing that the organization has done research implies that the program they came up with is probably the best solution. The end of the problems section should hint at goals that could be achieved if the organization receives its funding.
The next section should explain the goals that the organization will be able to achieve with the grant, if it is given. These goals should be the goals of the program. The goals should be achievable with the grant, and show the audience what improvements can be made to the program if the organization receives the grant. The end of the goals section should hint at the concepts behind the organization’s program.
The concepts section should talk about the concepts behind the program. These are the ways in which the program is designed to solve the problem. This section should discuss the program more fully than the introduction, and make the audience see how the program is the best option to solve the problem. The end of the concepts section should hint at the probable outcomes of the program.
The outcomes section should list the probable outcomes of the program, in relation to the problem and the goals. The organization should evaluate how probable it is that the program will solve the problem, and achieve its goals. The probable outcomes should be positive, because if there are negative ones, the program needs to be planned better. If there is an insurmountable problem, it should be addressed properly, to show that the organization has noticed and addressed it.
The budget section should explain where money will be spent on the program. It should include what things need to be bought for the program to run, and how much they cost. The organization may decide to attach a spreadsheet, to concisely explain the budget. The section should conclude with the overall cost of the program, if the program has a set limit, or the cost per month, if the program is intended to continue. The end of the budget section should hint at how the organization plans to fund the program.
The funding section should explain where the organization intends to get the money to run the program. Part of the funding section should be the grant that the grant proposal is for, but there should be other sources of funding. The other sources will show the foundation, government, or organization that other people approve of the program, and are willing to donate their money. It also shows them that the organization is not depending entirely on them for the implementation of the program. The funding section should show any pledged donations or challenge grants that the organization has already received towards the program, and major gifts that it is currently soliciting. The end of the funding section should hint at the conclusion of the grant proposal.
The grant proposal’s conclusion should re-cover all the sections that have been mentioned. It should explain once more how the program will solve the problem, what outcomes it will reach, and how it will be funded. The conclusion should emphasize the major benefits, focussing on areas of interest to the audience. The end of the conclusion should reiterate that the foundation, government, or corporation will be instrumental in helping the program to succeed.
Once the grant proposal has been drafted and reviewed, it should be submitted. Submitting the grant proposal allows it to be given to the decision makers, and approved or rejected. Making the grant proposal appeal to the decision makers makes it more likely to be approved, and makes the program more likely to succeed.
Resources:
- John Mutz and Katherine Murray’s Fundraising for Dummies